Arizona student Gabriel Matthew Schivone was invited to address the annual stockholder meeting of the Caterpillar Corporation that took place this year at the Marriot Riverwalk Hotel in San Antonio, Texas as a proxy shareholder on behalf of the largest Jewish-American peace group, Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), and other religious organizations. While the meeting was taking place, a locally organized demonstration to bring attention to Caterpillar’s presence in San Antonio and the company’s role in human rights abuses against Palestinians under Israeli occupation and Latino communities along the US/Mexico border and throughout the US. Below is the full text of Gabriel’s speech in support of shareholder “Proposal 8” which urges Caterpillar to adopt a review and public reporting of the company’s worldwide business practices, and to enact policies requiring all of their dealers to “conform more fully with international human rights and humanitarian standards."
CAT Shareholder Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 13, 2012
Board members, Mr. CEO, fellow shareholders:
Good morning. My name is Gabriel Matthew Schivone. I am a student from Tucson, AZ. I am speaking today as an authorized shareholder in favor of Proposal 8, on behalf of Jewish Voice for Peace and a robust coalition of religious organizations.
As a company, we claim that we cannot control what our dealers do with our equipment. And yet, in 2010, we issued a clear directive to all our dealers worldwide to avoid sales that are even likely to end up for use in the State of Iran. Why single out Iran without having a universal policy in place to apply human rights standards evenly across the globe? I remind us that companies like ours didn’t want to single out South Africa during apartheid; companies opted for general policies which, in turn, they were compelled to apply to South Africa through divestment.
Without a general policy, as Proposal 8 stipulates, we’re vulnerable to the charge of hypocrisy. For example, Israel has a far worse human rights record than Iran and is engaged in its 45th year of military occupation and settlement of the Palestinian West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem and crucially uses armies of our bulldozers to do it. This opens us up to more criticism of hypocrisy.
It also opens us up to legal action. I remind everyone here of the example that eminent New York District Judge Shira Scheindlin made out of IBM Systems in 2009 when their lawyers used our exact same argument in court. The South African apartheid regime used IBM equipment in ways that contributed to international crimes including unlawful killings, like those for which our company equipment has been used by the Israeli military against Palestinians and a young American college student. The IBM lawyers said the company was not responsible for how their clients used their products, just as we say it today. Judge Scheindlin sharply retorted: “That level of willful blindness in the face of crimes in violation of the law of nations cannot defeat an otherwise clear showing of knowledge that the assistance IBM provided would directly and substantially support apartheid.” I’ll repeat that phrase. “Willful blindness.” Willful blindness—remember that.