I read your column about global warming with some concern. Specifically, I could not distinguish your rhetoric from that of Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage. Your arguments were punctuated with terms dredged out of the "emotive language" lexicon. And, for the most part, your logic was that of the hard right--i.e., global warming is a conspiracy and not an emerging scientific conclusion.
I am a subscriber to The Nation and am seriously thinking of not renewing my subscription.
David G. Dickson Sr.
May 31 2007 - 10:34am