Noted.

Noted.

John Nichols on Tom DeLay, Isabel Macdonald on donor aid to Haiti

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

DELAY-ED JUSTICE: No one was surprised when a Texas jury found former House majority leader Tom DeLay guilty. The man who ran the House during much of the Bush/Cheney era—as the conniving puppet master to hapless Speaker Denny Hastert—engaged in money laundering as part of a grand scheme to use corporate cash to buy elections, flip control of the Texas House and redraw Congressional district lines to ensure Republican victories. DeLay could have ended up with more than 100 years of jail time; instead, a Texas judge gave him just three years. Tom Smith, who directs the Texas office of Public Citizen— which, along with Texans for Public Justice, kept pounding “The Hammer” even after he left Congress—said of the ruling, “His sentence of three years in prison is a far cry from justice when compared to the damage he has done to Texas households, the effects of which will be felt for decades to come.”

While the prospect that a figure once so powerful might actually spend even a modest amount of time behind bars points to some overdue accountability, the slight sentence neglects the fact that DeLay committed the crudest of electoral crimes. He subverted democracy, using money not just to influence elections but to warp the redistricting process in such a way that future elections would be meaningless. DeLay claims he was just engaging in a little political roughhousing. And that’s the problem. When elected leaders game the system so that elections don’t matter, they are not playing politics; they are committing acts that the founders identified in the Constitution as “high crimes.” DeLay should be held fully to account so that the current members of Congress might begin to respect their oath to support and defend the Constitution, which binds them to preserve and enhance democracy—not crush it with criminal conspiracies.   JOHN NICHOLS

WHERE’S THE MONEY? After a devastating earthquake killed more than 200,000 people in Haiti last year, the international community pledged $5.3 billion for 2010–11 at a UN conference to help Haiti “build back better,” with the US pledging $1.2 billion. Yet excluding debt relief, governments and international institutions have disbursed just $1.3 billion of the pledges they made, according to the UN Office of the Special Envoy to Haiti. The United States has disbursed only $120 million of its pledge. Of the European Community’s pledge of $294 million, it had paid $97.2 million by December. Canada, originally reported to have pledged $375 million for Haiti’s reconstruction, had paid only $55.3 million. Meanwhile, France has delivered less than a quarter of the $30 million it pledged to the Haiti Reconstruction Fund.

A scathing report by Oxfam called the lack of reconstruction progress “deeply disappointing,” citing the slow rate of delivering on UN pledges.   ISABEL MACDONALD

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x