Abstract

Medicare For All

Stark, Pete | February 6, 2006 issue

add to cart   close window

The article presents the author's views on healthcare in the United States. According to the author, healthcare providers and drug companies have manipulated the medical care system beyond comprehension in order to maximize profits and shareholder confidence. It is suggested that the existing Medicare program is capable of fixing the healthcare system in the U.S. The author introduce two proposals aimed at fixing Medicare.

See Also:

HEALTH insurance -- United States; MEDICAL policy; MEDICARE; HEALTH insurance; CORPORATE profits; OLDER people -- Medical care -- United States; UNITED States -- Politics & government -- 2001-2009; UNITED States
Articles are sold in 'packs,' which are priced as follows:

1 for 2.95
4 for 9.95
10 for 19.95
50 for 34.95
300 for 149.95
Sales of archive individual articles, full issues or article packs are final and no refunds will be issued.

In Your Cart

Your cart is empty.

My Articles

You must be logged in to view your articles.

User name

Password

I don't have a login.

I forgot my user name/password.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Notion

There's No 'Compromise' Protection Against Predators | Good riddance to the Senate's bipartisan effort to build a weak Consumer Financial Protection Agency.
Kai Wright
36 Comments

» The Beat

Comrade Limbaugh Hails the Genius of Socialized Medicine | And why not? His favored national health care system, Costa Rica's, ranks higher than the U.S. system and delivers longer life expectancy.
John Nichols
109 Comments

» Act Now!

Glenn Beck Attacks ME! | Now attack him back.
Peter Rothberg
42 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | On Evan Thomas, birthers, and the health care bill "stepping-stone" argument.
Eric Alterman

» And Another Thing

Nazia Quazi Update | Watch the video; write a letter; get involved!
Katha Pollitt
39 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Nation editor Chris Hayes guest-hosts Maddow. Plus: 145 years of women's history and an exchange about the conservation movement's future.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
19 Comments