Abstract

The British Program: 1965 the Target Year

Cockcroft, John | June 18, 1955 issue

add to cart   close window

For some years the U.S. Department of Atomic Energy has been developing the production and exploitation of atomic energy in order to create a new source of energy to supplement coal, oil, and gasoline. The U.S. has built two largish research establishments at Harwell and Aldermaston, one dealing with the civil and the other with the military side of research and development of atomic energy, though there is naturally some cross-tie and the work on the production of fissile materials. The U.S. has established at Harwell a major source of the world's supply of radioactive isotopes.

See Also:

NUCLEAR energy; POWER resources; RADIOISOTOPES; RENEWABLE energy sources; COAL; GASOLINE; UNITED States
Articles are sold in 'packs,' which are priced as follows:

1 for 2.95
4 for 9.95
10 for 19.95
50 for 34.95
300 for 149.95
Sales of archive individual articles, full issues or article packs are final and no refunds will be issued.

In Your Cart

Your cart is empty.

My Articles

You must be logged in to view your articles.

User name

Password

I don't have a login.

I forgot my user name/password.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Another Helping of FDR Please | Obama should follow the New Deal president's example and make his Thanksgiving Proclamation a call for economic justice.
John Nichols
67 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
93 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
95 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
112 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
59 Comments