Abstract

Should Supreme Court Nominees Have Opinions?
Levinson, Sanford | October 17, 1981 issue

add to cart   close window

Focuses on the reluctance of Sandra Day O'Connor to discuss her judicial views on specific cases of the U.S. Supreme Court as they apply to critical areas of social policy, during her confirmation hearings for appointment as justice to the Supreme Court. Statement given by O'Conner to the Senate Judiciary Committee reflecting her reluctance to comment on specific supreme court cases; Justification for Senators to seek views about critical issues of constitutional law and theory from supreme court nominees; Implications of the O'Connor decision on future confirmation hearings.

See Also:

O'CONNOR, Sandra Day, 1930-; JUDICIAL discretion; UNITED States. Supreme Court; UNITED States
ARCHIVE HOME
Pricing
Articles are sold in 'packs,' which are priced as follows:

1 for 2.95
4 for 9.95
10 for 19.95
50 for 34.95
300 for 149.95
Refund Policy
Sales of archive individual articles, full issues or article packs are final and no refunds will be issued.
Access for libraries
help
Search
Browse
Sample Article

In Your Cart

Your cart is empty.

My Articles

You must be logged in to view your articles.

User name

Password

I don't have a login.

I forgot my user name/password.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
18 Comments
Posted at 9:18 ET

» Act Now!

Coal Country | "This is a civil war."
Peter Rothberg
78 Comments

» The Notion

A Blow to Privatization in Israel (and Perhaps Beyond) | A potentially historic ruling on prison privatization, in Israel.
Eyal Press
29 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
97 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
144 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman